Introduction

“If in the first act you have hung a pistol on the wall, then in the following one it should be fired. Otherwise don’t put it there.” (1)

But what if your ‘gun’ is a sentient sword, a time-travel device, or an ancient prophecy? Can this classic principle apply to science fiction and fantasy if there are no guns in use?

Science fiction and fantasy writers face a unique challenge when it comes to Chekhov’s Gun. These highly advanced and magical worlds are filled with cursed objects, complex technologies, and intricate systems. All of these require a thorough explanation without going overboard. One of the problems commonly faced is that of world-builders disease, where the minor details are given more focus than the major. The beauty of Chekhov’s Gun is its dedication to the simplicity of using named objects from early parts of the story in the later sections. It creates a sense of payoff for the readers, and a structure for the writers.

This post will explore the ways a speculative fiction author can use Chekhov’s Gun to enhance their story, balance world-building, and how to do it without telegraphing or creating deus ex machina.

A quick warning, where we’re talking about setups and payoffs, there is a high likelyhood of spoilers. Please feel free to skip them if you recognize a title you have yet to read.

Understanding Chekhov’s Gun in Speculative Fiction

Defining Chekhov’s Gun in more general terms might be a good way to build your understanding of this concept within speculative fiction. For our purposes, Chekhov’s Gun is the approach that significant story elements introduced in your story should carry a narrative purpose. These elements will later “fire” or pay off in meaningful ways to the story. The keyword is “significant.” While you may be laying in red herrings, world-building, and character moments, defining your significant elements will help build a more satisfying payoff.

What makes an element significant?

• Does the element play a role in the midpoint or climax of the story?
• Is the element key to character and story development?
• If you were to take this element out of the story, would it lessen the story?

Don’t ask these questions to dismiss your other details, but to help determine which elements you ensure to close the loop on by the end of the story. For example, while swords may be important to your story, not every sword will be Excalibur level.

Science fiction and fantasy make this concept more challenging because of the extensive world-building common in these genres. Your world-building may include anything from alien biology, magic rules, technological systems, or even vast economics that are central to the story. While those tools might not drive the plot directly, they are critical to building the atmosphere of the world and hitting those reader expectations. A tavern scene in a fantasy novel is a common scene. If you spend paragraphs describing a shady character hiding out in the shadows of the back corner of the tavern your readers will expect them to matter. Each of the elements offer a chance for a Chekov’s Gun, but it comes down to your discretion so you don’t fall into the next pare of the sci-fi and fantasy challenge.

You have loaded guns everywhere.

While that may work for John Wick, your loaded guns need to be balanced with the rest of the story. (Unless your goal is to write a story where a gun is fired on every page, which may work for some thriller/adventure stories.) You’ll know when you reach the point of too many guns when its starting to feel exhausting keeping track of them as you write. Also, beta readers should be telling you if there are just too many important/seemingly important “guns” appearing without payoff. The goal is to lay in the elements that are important. Let them appear naturally so the reader barely registers them until the moment they become important.

You can find a great example of Chekhov’s Gun in The Lord of the Rings by J. R. R. Tolkien. Early in the story, the mithril shirt is introduced as a casual gift and is mentioned rarely. It’s not until the mithril shirt saves Frodo’s life that many readers remember he’s been wearing it throughout the entire journey. I like this example because its something small, light, and can easily be forgotton by the readers and the characters. Use that concept as a building block for your Chekhov’s Gun elements as you introduce them in your story.

The Art of Planting: Making Setup Feel Natural

Planting the Chekhov’s gun well depends on how natural your setup is. The more earned the revelation is, the better the readers react to it. So, what are some ways you can match Tolkien’s efforts to bring in something critical early on without making it obvious?

The Three-Mention Technique

The three-mention technique follows the idea that the item is mentioned twice before the final payoff scene. You can break it down into the following:

• First: Background/world-building
  • The first mention allows for the readers to be introduced to the “gun.” It can be passed off as unimportant, just something to orient the character to their situation, or a seemingly off-handed mention that doesn’t apply to the current part of the story.
• Second: Reminder with slightly more emphasis
  • Your second mention of this “gun” should stick in your readers mind a bit more, but not by much. Repetition is a key to the human mind signalling that while it may not have appeared frequently, its something to remember. That off-handed comment has some more connective tissue, but the character and reader should still be blind to its full implications.
• Third: Final Payoff
  • Finally, your tidbit, object, or whatever else your “gun” is, comes to fruition. You bring it in to full effect and show how it impacts your plot, character, or subvert the world-building you’ve created up to that point. Your previous set-ups should have implicated the capacity of the “gun” so the readers don’t feel that sense of deus ex machina.

The three-mention technique is a great tool to balance your plants and give your readers a satisfying lead-up and payoff. One thing to keep in mind though, is the growth of AI and how readers view its writing style. There’s a growing caution around groups of three in writing as being AI generated, really, its just something that writers have done for a long time. My recommendation to combat this is to look at the complexity of your Chekhov’s Gun to determine how much lead-up you need for a satisfying payoff. We’ll talk about this more in the next few sections.

Camouflage Through Context

Sometimes the greatest Chekhov’s Guns are those that are so hidden on the first read through that they are dismissed until they become important. Think of a young magician learning the limitations of their magic through experimentation. Their mentor introduces it as a minor rule, but something that can’t be overcome by a well-trained magician. Later this limitation will be the villain’s fatal flaw. Or you can reveal a weakness of an alien species during a cultural exchange with the protagonist that seems like a minor inconvenience at the time. Each of these moments help bury the “guns” in your stories. But how much camouflage is needed for each?

Something major like the alien weakness will take more camouflage to create a more satisfying payoff. Say rainwater on another planet is the alien’s weakness, but they rule over the world. Consider how your aliens would keep from revealing their weakness. They can walk around in the open in mechanized armor, never come out during the rainy season, or develop a religion that keeps their kind from the rain without drawing questions. Layering in your camouflage helps build believability around the situation while letting the reader have that “Aha!” moment when the weakness is revealed.

Your “guns” aren’t just physical but emotional and character relationship moments. A person who has a crippling history is going to avoid talking about their past, even if they seem to have highly applicable information. This is commonly seen in the character lying about who they are or what they’ve done for work before. At first they start out as just another new character, but each new story event should wear away at some of the camouflage.

You can find an example of this in Orson Scott Card’s Ender’s Game. One of the elements of the story that has stuck with me long after and through each read is that of the mind game. The mind game is initially presented as a game to entertain Ender that endlessly exhausts his mind. The further he goes into the fantasy game the more it shows signs of being something else as he explores past traumas through a complicated simulation. The payoff comes when its revealed that the game is a mental conditioning program created by the military. The final level he beats gives him the final push he needs to accept the ending of the alien race he orchestrated.

The Payoff: Making Your Guns Fire Satisfyingly

Within science fiction and fantasy, there’s a concept known as the rule of limitations. This means that the powers, technology, or magic that the characters use, or are used against them, have limitations. If you want to go deeper into this exact concept, check out the following articles:

When it comes to making your Chekhov Gun fire satisfyingly, then it means respecting the limitations created by the initial setup. Early on in the Lord of the Rings storyline we’re shown that using the one ring can have damaging effects on the mind. So that sets up the expectation that every time Frodo puts it on, it will come with a cost. If at the end of the journey Frodo were to be fine and he could carry on with life as normal, then that would have been much less satisfying. The limitation of not being able to wear the ring at all times creates its own challenges that the protagonist has to deal with throughout his journey. I.e. invisibility doesn’t mean invulnerability. Consider the following questions to see if you’ve met the first part of a satisfying payoff.

• Have I followed the rules of my setup in this payoff scene?
• Was the final power, technology, or magic properly projected?
• At any point, have I let the chaos of creativity extend my “gun” beyond its true limits?
• How does this “gun” effect my character and how they face the next part of the story?

These answers should help you steer away from deviatons and the first steps in creating a satisfying fire of your “gun.”

Conclusion

Chekhov’s Gun in science fiction and fantasy is a powerful tool that can hel deepen your readers experience and build their trust in you as an author. While it may feel more complicated at times, the introduction of significant elements of your world can lead to satisfying payoffs, and deliver on the promises you make in your stories. Ensuring you track your prominent items, power limits, technology levels, or prophecies will keep your story clean and rewarding for your readers. It will also help you feel more satisfied when the drafts evolve into published works.

Audit your manuscript for any “loaded guns.” Make two lists: 1. Identify any significant elements you’ve introduced with detail or emphasis. Do they all fire meaningfully? If not, either cut or repurpose them. 2. Identify crucial plot resolutions. Are they all properly set up? Or do some appear conveniently? You can view these two lists as working forward and working backward. Looking at your story from different directions can help build that strength in a story that makes it unforgettable.

If you hang a magical sword on the wall, it should be drawn eventually. When it is, let it be for the story and not because it’s just a weapon. And if you’re not going to use that sword, then look to something else on the wall that will be used.

Additional Resources

• Books on craft:
  • Story Engineering by Larry Brooks (on setup and payoff structure)
  • The Anatomy of Story by John Truby (on controlling reader information and expectations)
  • Wired for Story by Lisa Cron (on how readers process and remember information)
• SF/F specific resources:
  • Brandon Sanderson’s Laws of Magic, particularly the First Law about reader understanding and problem-solving
  • Writing Excuses podcast episodes on worldbuilding vs. plot and narrative promises
  • Orson Scott Card’s How to Write Science Fiction and Fantasy (on establishing rules and conventions)
• Examples to study for excellent setup and payoff:
  • The Way of Kings by Brandon Sanderson (multiple magic systems with clear rules that pay off)
  • Ender’s Game by Orson Scott Card (layered setups throughout)
  • Harry Potter series by J.K. Rowling (particularly how magical rules established early solve later problems)
  • Arrival (film) by Denis Villeneuve (linguistic setup paying off in temporal understanding)
  • The Martian by Andy Weir (scientific principles established then applied creatively)
• Checklist for Chekhov’s Gun balance:
  • [ ] Every emphasized or detailed element serves a narrative purpose
  • [ ] Major plot solutions are established at least 20% of the story before they’re needed
  • [ ] Complex magic/technology rules are demonstrated, not just explained
  • [ ] At least one setup element pays off in an unexpected but logical way
  • [ ] No convenient new powers, items, or rules appear solely to solve problems
  • [ ] Worldbuilding texture exists without every detail being plot-crucial
• References:
  • (1) Gurliand, Ilia (11 July 1904). “Reminiscences of A.P. Chekhov”. Театр и искусство (Teatr i iskusstvo – Theater and art) (28): 521.

Previous Post: Red Herrings: Misdirection in Plot

Next Post: Parallel Plotlines: Juggling Multiple Stories